A good example of a current event that demonstrates material viewed and outside sources is the reporting on the potential impacts of a new technology, like AI-powered translation tools, on the job market. This involves analyzing information presented in news articles, online videos (like tech reviews or company presentations), and expert opinions (from economists or academics), and then comparing it with the claims made by the technology companies themselves.Here's why this fits the description: Material viewed:News articles about the technology, videos demonstrating its capabilities, and company websites outlining their vision for the technology are all examples of "material viewed."Outside sources:Articles from economists discussing the potential job displacement, academic research on the effects of automation, and expert opinions from industry analysts represent "outside sources" that offer different perspectives and potential counterpoints to the company's claims.Comparison and contrast:By comparing the claims made by the company in their promotional material with the perspectives of independent experts, you can assess the potential impact of the technology on the job market more accurately. For example, a company might claim that their translation tool will make global communication easier, while an economist might point out that it could lead to job losses in translation and interpretation fields.This example highlights how important it is to consider multiple sources when evaluating a current event, especially when one of the sources is a company promoting its own product or service.