"Larger states should have more influence in the legislature because they have more people."
"Each state should have an equal vote, regardless of its population."
"Representation should be proportional to the amount of taxes a state pays."
"Equal representation ensures that smaller states are not dominated by larger states."
The first statement, about larger states having more influence because of their population, clearly supports the Virginia Plan.
The second statement, saying each state should have an equal vote, is a direct argument for the New Jersey Plan.
The third statement, linking representation to the amount of taxes a state pays, leans towards the Virginia Plan, since larger states would likely pay more taxes.
Finally, the fourth statement, about protecting smaller states from being dominated, is a key argument in favor of the New Jersey Plan.
So, to summarize:
Statement 1: Virginia Plan
Statement 2: New Jersey Plan
Statement 3: Virginia Plan
Statement 4: New Jersey Plan
Answer (2)
Yes, that's a good breakdown of the statements in terms of their alignment with the Virginia and New Jersey Plans. Statement 1. "Larger states should have more influence in the legislature because they have more people." — Virginia Plan (favored larger states with proportional representation).Statement 2. "Each state should have an equal vote, regardless of its population." — New Jersey Plan (favored equal representation for each state).Statement 3. "Representation should be proportional to the amount of taxes a state pays." — Virginia Plan (this is more aligned with larger states contributing more in taxes).Statement 4. "Equal representation ensures that smaller states are not dominated by larger states." — New Jersey Plan (focuses on protecting smaller states).
The statement "larger states should have more influence in the legislature because they have more people" supports the Virginia Plan, which proposed representation based on population. The other statements represent different perspectives on representation: equal vote per state (New Jersey Plan), representation based on taxes, and equal representation for smaller states. Here's a breakdown: Virginia Plan:This plan proposed a bicameral legislature where both houses would have representation based on state population. This would give larger states with more people more representatives and therefore more power in the legislature.New Jersey Plan:This plan proposed a unicameral legislature with equal representation for each state, regardless of population, ensuring that smaller states wouldn't be overshadowed by larger ones.Representation based on taxes:This perspective suggests that a state's influence in the legislature should be proportional to the amount of tax revenue it contributes to the national government.Equal representation for smaller states:This viewpoint emphasizes the importance of protecting the interests of smaller states by ensuring that each state has an equal voice in the legislature.
