Explain how ethical relativism differs from moral absolutism - 5-7 sentences
ETHICS SUBJECT
Answer (1)
Ethical relativism and moral absolutism are two opposing views on the nature of morality. Ethical relativism holds that moral principles are not universal and can vary between cultures, societies, or individuals. It suggests that what is right or wrong depends on the context, and no single standard can apply to all people. In contrast, moral absolutism asserts that there are fixed, universal moral principles that apply to everyone, regardless of context or culture. According to moral absolutism, certain actions are inherently right or wrong, independent of beliefs or situations. The key difference lies in ethical relativism's flexibility versus moral absolutism's rigid, universal rules.
