a. What are the key features of Quezon City’s regulatory governance framework, and how do they contribute to effective local administration?b. Identify at least two challenges faced by Quezon City in implementing regulatory policies. How has the local government addressed these challenges?c. Based on the case study, what lessons can other local government units (LGUs) in the Philippines learn from Quezon City’s regulatory governance practices?
Answer (1)
a. Key Features of Quezon City's Regulatory Governance Framework and Their Contribution to Effective Local AdministrationLegislative Structure – Quezon City's governance is anchored by its City Council, known as the Sangguniang Panlungsod, comprising 38 members. This includes 36 councilors elected from six councilor districts and two ex officio members representing barangay chairpersons and youth councils. The Vice Mayor serves as the presiding officer. This structure ensures diverse representation, facilitating the creation of ordinances and resolutions that address the specific needs of various sectors within the city. Comprehensive Powers and Functions – The City Council is empowered to enact ordinances, approve resolutions, and appropriate funds aimed at promoting the general welfare of the city's residents. Their responsibilities encompass generating resources for development plans, regulating land use, and ensuring the efficient delivery of basic services. Such comprehensive authority enables the council to address a wide array of local issues effectively. Strategic Implementation of Policies – The city has adopted innovative policies like the No Contact Apprehension Policy (NCAP) to enhance traffic management. By utilizing traffic enforcement cameras and closed-circuit television, the NCAP allows for the enforcement of traffic laws without the need for on-site traffic enforcers, aiming to reduce traffic violations and improve road safety. b. Challenges Faced by Quezon City in Implementing Regulatory Policies and the Local Government's ResponsesPublic Opposition to Policies – The implementation of the NCAP faced criticism from vehicle owners and transport groups, particularly concerning the lack of immediate notification for violations and issues related to due process. In response, the Quezon City government defended the policy, citing its legality and effectiveness in instilling traffic discipline. Mayor Joy Belmonte highlighted a significant decrease in traffic violations, by 93% in areas where NCAP was implemented, emphasizing the policy's role in enhancing road safety. Legal Challenges – The NCAP faced legal scrutiny, leading to a temporary restraining order from the Supreme Court, suspending its implementation. The local government complied with the order while maintaining that the policy had benefited their constituencies by reducing traffic violations and improving road safety. c. Lessons for Other Local Government Units (LGUs) in the Philippines from Quezon City's Regulatory Governance PracticesInnovative Policy Implementation – Quezon City's adoption of the NCAP demonstrates the potential benefits of leveraging technology to enhance public service delivery. Other LGUs can consider similar initiatives to improve efficiency and reduce human error or corruption in enforcement processes.Stakeholder Engagement and Transparency – The challenges faced during the NCAP's implementation underscore the importance of engaging stakeholders and ensuring transparency. Other LGUs should prioritize clear communication, public consultations, and addressing concerns proactively to build public trust and facilitate smoother policy implementation.Resilience and Adaptability – Quezon City's experience highlights the need for LGUs to be resilient and adaptable when faced with legal and public opinion challenges. Continuously assessing and refining policies based on feedback and legal guidance can lead to more robust and accepted governance practices.[tex][/tex]
