Charles Goring's Theory (1870-1919)- the medical officer in prison of England who accepted the Lombroso's challenge that body physique is a determinant to behavior. Goring concluded that there is no such thing as physical chemical type. He contradicted the Lombroso's idea that criminality can be seen through features alone. Nevertheless, Goring accepted that criminals are physically inferior to normal individuals in the sense that criminals tend to be shorter and have less weight than non-criminals explain it and give me example
Answer (1)
Got it, shifting back to Charles Goring's Theory:Charles Goring challenged Lombroso's idea that criminal behavior could be identified through physical features alone. Goring, through his extensive study of over 3,000 English convicts, concluded that there is no distinct "criminal type" based on physical characteristics. However, he did find that criminals tended to be shorter and lighter in weight compared to non-criminals.Goring's Theory ExplainedGoring's findings emphasized that while there are no definitive physical features that distinguish criminals, there were still notable physical differences. Specifically, criminals were generally shorter and had less weight compared to the average non-criminal.ExampleImagine two people of the same age and intelligence, one who is a criminal and the other a law-abiding citizen. According to Goring's findings, you wouldn't be able to distinguish them based on facial features or body types alone. However, the criminal might be statistically shorter and lighter in weight compared to the non-criminal.This nuanced perspective highlights the complexity of identifying criminal behavior and challenges the simplistic views of his time.
