The house supports the revival of the death penalty in the Philippines for heinous crimes. Agree and why?
Answer (1)
Deterrence: Supporters argue that the death penalty deters serious crimes, as the ultimate punishment discourages potential criminals.Justice: Some believe that the death penalty is a just punishment for heinous crimes, offering closure to victims’ families and ensuring that the most serious offenders face the ultimate consequence.Cost-effectiveness: Proponents argue that the death penalty is more cost-effective than life imprisonment, as it eliminates the long-term costs of incarceration.Public Safety: Some believe that the death penalty protects society by permanently removing dangerous criminals from circulation.It’s crucial to consider the counterarguments as well, which often focus on:Injustice and potential for error: The death penalty is irreversible, and there is always a risk of executing an innocent person.Lack of evidence for deterrence: Studies have shown mixed results on the effectiveness of the death penalty as a deterrent.Moral and ethical concerns: Many people believe that the death penalty is morally wrong and violates human rights.Alternatives to the death penalty: Supporters of abolishing the death penalty argue that life imprisonment without parole is a sufficient punishment and offers the possibility of rehabilitation.
