Answer:A. Judging the Truthfulness of StatementsEvaluating the truthfulness of the statements listed can vary in ease depending on the realm they belong to—scientific facts, historical interpretations, moral claims, and political assertions. For example, it is straightforward to affirm that "the sun is the center of the solar system" based on established astronomical evidence. However, statements like “a person must always consider the interest of his/her family before his/her own happiness” require deeper reflection, as they hinge on personal values and cultural norms.B. True Statements and Those Requiring ReflectionThe scientifically objective statements, such as “the sun is the center of the solar system” and “Asia is the largest continent in the world,” are clearly true and universally accepted. On the other hand, assertions like "God made the world in seven days” and “China’s continued presence in the Spratlys is a violation of international law” may evoke varied responses depending on one’s religious beliefs and geopolitical perspectives, respectively. The latter requires an understanding of international relations and legal frameworks, which may not be universally accepted.C. Subjective TruthsStatements regarding family values, such as “a person must always consider the interest of his/her family before his/her own happiness,” can be true for many individuals and cultures but not universally applicable. Personal experiences, individual priorities, and cultural backgrounds shape beliefs about family obligations. Similarly, “citizens have the right to take up arms and overthrow an oppressive government” may resonate with some in contexts of oppression, while others might advocate for peaceful resistance.D. Personal Beliefs Open to DisputeMany people may personally believe in the statement "the president has done very little to uphold democracy and look after the interests of the Filipino people." This assertion could invoke strong opinions based on political viewpoints and is subject to challenge by those who support the current administration's actions. Likewise, the assertion concerning China's presence in the Spratlys can be seen as factual by some but may be contested by others who view such actions differently based on historical claims or strategic interests.